[PATCH] sched: Account blkio delay independently of delayed dequeue
From: Christian Loehle
Date: Wed Oct 14 2026 - 12:18:42 EST
Starting blkio delay accounting in __block_task() ties the interval to
removal from the runqueue. With EEVDF delayed dequeue, this misses the
initial part of an I/O sleep, or the entire sleep if the task wakes
before it is dequeued. Final dequeue can also run in another task's
context, causing delayacct_blkio_start() to timestamp the wrong task.
Start accounting in try_to_block_task(), when the current task commits
to blocking, before delayed dequeue or proxy execution can retain it on
the runqueue. End accounting when clearing is_blocked, including queued
wakeups and the proxy execution paths that let the current task continue.
Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261014081731.1068794-1-zhanxusheng@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 152e11f6df29 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue")
Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +---
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 1fe40de6ebe3..824c8278d2fc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int task_llc(const struct task_struct *p)
*
* p->is_blocked <- { 0, 1 }:
*
- * is set by try_to_block_task() and cleared by ttwu_do_wakeup() and tracks
+ * is set by try_to_block_task() and cleared by unblock_task() and tracks
* if the task is blocked. Traditionally this would mirror p->on_rq, however
* due things like DELAY_DEQUEUE and PROXY_EXEC, this can diverge.
*
@@ -3737,12 +3737,20 @@ ttwu_stat(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
__schedstat_inc(p->stats.nr_wakeups_sync);
}
+static inline void unblock_task(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (p->is_blocked && p->in_iowait)
+ delayacct_blkio_end(p);
+
+ p->is_blocked = 0;
+}
+
/*
* Mark the task runnable.
*/
static inline void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct task_struct *p)
{
- p->is_blocked = 0;
+ unblock_task(p);
WRITE_ONCE(p->__state, TASK_RUNNING);
trace_sched_wakeup(p);
}
@@ -3839,10 +3847,8 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED;
if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED)
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
- else if (p->in_iowait) {
- delayacct_blkio_end(p);
+ else if (p->in_iowait)
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
- }
activate_task(rq, p, en_flags);
wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags);
@@ -4415,10 +4421,8 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
cpu = select_task_rq(p, p->wake_cpu, &wake_flags);
if (task_cpu(p) != cpu) {
- if (p->in_iowait) {
- delayacct_blkio_end(p);
+ if (p->in_iowait)
atomic_dec(&task_rq(p)->nr_iowait);
- }
wake_flags |= WF_MIGRATED;
psi_ttwu_dequeue(p);
@@ -6762,6 +6766,9 @@ static bool try_to_block_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
p->is_blocked = 1;
+ if (p->in_iowait)
+ delayacct_blkio_start();
+
/*
* We check should_block after signal_pending because we
* will want to wake the task in that case. But if
@@ -6934,7 +6941,7 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (!mutex) {
clear_task_blocked_on(p, mutex);
if (task_current(rq, p)) {
- p->is_blocked = 0;
+ unblock_task(p);
return p;
}
goto deactivate;
@@ -6970,7 +6977,7 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
*/
__clear_task_blocked_on(p, NULL);
if (task_current(rq, p)) {
- p->is_blocked = 0;
+ unblock_task(p);
return p;
}
goto deactivate;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 4c25fbe84fb5..638c7709654a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3072,10 +3072,8 @@ static inline void __block_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (p->sched_contributes_to_load)
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
- if (p->in_iowait) {
+ if (p->in_iowait)
atomic_inc(&rq->nr_iowait);
- delayacct_blkio_start();
- }
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(p->on_rq);
--
2.34.1