Re: [PATCH RFC 11/16] clk: qcom: gdsc: Make GDSC parenting optional

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 10/14/26 4:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 04:20:54PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/14/26 4:17 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 02:19:11PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Clock controller power-domain attachments currently become parents of all
>>>> top-level GDSCs exported by that controller. This conflates resources
>>>> needed to access or operate the controller with actual power-collapse
>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>
>>>> Allow callers of gdsc_register() to suppress parents inferred from the
>>>> controller device and its attached domain list.
>>>
>>> I think, each GDSC has a parent (in the hardware). If we don't represent
>>> it in practice, we likely need to fix that.
>>
>> The next patch allows setting a precise set of parents instead. Perhaps
>> this commit message could be improved.
> 
> Or the commits needs to be squashed / reverted. I really don't think
> that we should have a parent-less GDSC.

FWIW this commit alone is a NOP.

Konrad