Re: [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch gfp_t to unsigned long

From: Andrew Morton

Date: Fri Mar 20 2026 - 12:29:41 EST


On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 09:37:52 +0000 Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Human summary of Sashiko (AI) review [0]
>
> [PATCH 2/5] iwlegacy: 3945-mac: Use special gfp_t format specifier
>
> Just identifying pre-existing (and low-stakes) issues in the code. I
> can add a patch to fix them up.
>
> Andrew, I think it probably makes sense to merge these cleanup patches
> regardless of the gfp_t change, as Zi said. Would you take them
> through mm or would they need to go via the more specific branches?

In an ideal world the subsystem trees would take such changes.

In the real world it's more reliable for me to take them all, make sure
the relevant maintainers are cc'ed. If they ack the patch then great.
If they merge the patch then I'll drop the mm.git duplicate. If they
say nothing and it has decent linux-next exposure then ho hum, in it
goes.