Re: [PATCH 0/5] mm: Switch gfp_t to unsigned long

[Brendan Jackman]

Human summary of Sashiko (AI) review [0]

[PATCH 2/5] iwlegacy: 3945-mac: Use special gfp_t format specifier

  Just identifying pre-existing (and low-stakes) issues in the code. I
  can add a patch to fix them up.

  Andrew, I think it probably makes sense to merge these cleanup patches
  regardless of the gfp_t change, as Zi said. Would you take them
  through mm or would they need to go via the more specific branches?

[PATCH 5/5] mm: Change gfp_t to unsigned long

  - 1 << __GFP_BITS_SHIFT needs to be updated to use 1UL.

  - Need to update userspace tools like perf.

  - Says I can't use unsigned long in module_param_unsafe(), which I
    think is true. I did that to address a build failure, maybe I never
    actually repeated the build?

Other patches got a green tick.

[0] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319-gfp64-v1-0-2c73b8d42b7f%40google.com