Re: [PATCH 2/2] docs: Improve wording in Sphinx dependency checker

[Dongliang Mu]

On 10/28/26 8:07 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/27/26 10:07 AM, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > @@ -784,10 +782,10 @@ class SphinxDependencyChecker(MissingCheckers):
> >               if not self.distro_msg:
> >                   self.distro_msg = \
> >                       "Note: RHEL-based distros typically require extra repositories.\n" \
> > -                    "For most, enabling epel and crb are enough:\n" \
> > +                    "For most, enabling EPEL and CRB is enough:\n" \
> I think that "are" is correct here since the subject is plural.


From my understanding, enabling XXX is the subject, so I change it to 
"is". However, this is not very clear.

How about "For most, the EPEL and CRB repositories are enough:\n"? This 
seems more clear.

Dongliang Mu


> Otherwise this is a nice improvement. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>