Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] perf annotate arm64: Support instruction tracking for data type profiling

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 09:19:14AM +0800, Tengda Wu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2026/10/22 7:46, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 06:48:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 09:18:38AM +0800, Tengda Wu wrote:
> >>> On 2026/10/16 7:11, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>>>> Please let me know if you have any feedback.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot for your work!  Assuming you'll fix the issues from Sashiko
> >>>> in the next version, you can add my:
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I'll address the issues reported by Sashiko and send a v8.
> >>> Most of them are minor, and I'll fix them accordingly (or explain
> >>> in the v8 thread if I think any of them is a false positive).
> >>> I'll carry your Reviewed-by in the next version as agreed.
> >>
> >> I applied the first 5 patches that are sashiko-clean, will push soon to
> >> tmp.perf-tools-next and then to perf-tools next after test building on
> >> my containers.
> > 
> > There is v8 already which should have addressed the concerns.
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1792411435.git.wutengda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> 
> Yes, applying based on v8 would be better. All Sashiko comments have been
> addressed in v8, so the whole series can be applied and tested as-is.

ok, I'll get it then.

thanks,

- Arnaldo