Re: [PATCH 0/4] media: iris: Add support for nord platform

[Gourav Kumar]

On 9/24/2026 12:39 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:52:52AM +0530, Vishnu Reddy wrote:
>>
>> On 9/23/2026 7:17 PM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 10:14:54AM +0530, Vishnu Reddy wrote:
>>>> The nord platform integrates the Qualcomm iris video codec hardware,
>>>> which is compatible with the glymur based iris implementation.
>>>>
>>>> This series reuses the glymur DT schema to accommodate nord iris
>>>> support and adds the required iris device tree node to the relevant
>>>> nord device tree.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> Vishnu Reddy (4):
>>>>       dt-bindings: media: qcom,nord-iris: Add nord video codec
>>> The binding should go through media subsystem. That said, this series
>>> should be named with "arm64: dts: qcom: ..." and only contain the 3 DTS
>>> patches.
>>
>> Are you recommending splitting this into two separate series, one containing
>> the codec binding patch and another containing the three DTS patches?
>>
>> I can certainly do that, but could you elaborate on the reason for preferring
>> that approach? I'm trying to understand whether this is due to the expected
>> routing through different trees/maintainers or if there is another consideration.
> 
> The routing is one reason. The other one is that the split will make it
> easier for us to build Qualcomm Linux topic branches by pulling patch
> series from list using b4.
> 
This series adds complete Iris support for Nord and contains only the
binding change and the three related DTS patches.

Previous QCOM VPU enablement series have kept these changes together,
and I don’t see technical benefit to splitting this one.If separate
maintainer-tree routing is preferred, we can split the series accordingly.

Gourav Kumar

> Shawn