Re: [PATCH] docs: remove Assisted-by references

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 02:42:09PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 11:23:53PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:

> > I think we're going about this the wrong way.  What we want is high
> > quality contributions.  If they are high quality, who cares if they
> > are AI-generated or not?

> Recently 2 people sent 1,000 patches over 2 hours. Care to check each and
> every patch for 'quality'? :) Only the beginning.

And, crucially, unlike what would have tended to happen in the past with
mass patch sending a lot of the time the patches tend not to be
repetitive patches fixing the same issue in the same way in many places
like are seen when someone has a shiny new static check.

> > I also suspect it should be possible to use something like Jev or some
> > other System One LLM to help with an initial prioritization for the
> > patch, and then have that prioritization be set in patchwork.  Each

> Using AI to detect AI right now works, who knows in the future. But that's
> an arms race which we'll eventually lose. Which also costs money...

Reports I've seen from other areas suggest a noticable false positive
rate even with the current stuff.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature