Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] ceph: don't unregister an MDS session before removing its caps

[Alex Markuze]

Max, Please resend the patchset, the tree has diverged since this
patchset was sent back in September.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 1:46 PM Alex Markuze <amarkuze@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since the last merge with main Linux the testing branch has grown by
> upwards of 100 acked patches.
> Xiubo acked your patch, which is good enough for me, Xiubo is back on
> the maintainers list for ceph client.
> I'll take another look at the discussion for fairness' sake.
>
> Feel free to submit and argue for any other patches you feel are necessary.
> If a patch solves a problem or adds needed functionality it will be
> reviewed and applied as always.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 12:50 PM Max Kellermann
> <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 11:15 AM chenyuxi (D) <chenyuxi19@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Do you have any plans to move this series forward?
> > [...]
> > > Is there anything still holding the series back that we could
> > > help with?
> >
> > It was rejected by Alex Markuze, and he never replied to me after I
> > questioned the two reviews. That's what's holding this back.
> >
> > As for my plans - I have more Ceph unpublished fixes in our internal
> > Linux kernel fork, but I'm not submitting them, see
> > https://lore.kernel.org/ceph-devel/CAKPOu+8SiwxT_44e63-EZ4T_4d-tGjwmk_Lx8i4KgZOL5JnMtQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > for why.
> > I just looked it up: the stack of Ceph patches in our fork has grown
> > to 67 patches. They were either rejected or ignored. One of the
> > rejected patches fixes a security vulnerability.
> >
> > --
> > Max Kellermann
> > Principal Architect
> > Hosting Technology
> >
> > cm4all | Im Mediapark 6a | 50670 Köln | Germany
> > General information about the company can be found here:
> > https://www.cm4all.com/impressum
> > A member of the IONOS Group
> >