Re: [PATCH] driver core: fix race between bus_remove_driver() and dev_driver_uevent()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 08:24:20PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> When a device driver is being removed, bus_remove_driver() removes the
> driver from the bus klist before detaching it from bound devices. If
> dev_driver_uevent() runs concurrently on another CPU, it may acquire the
> bus klist lock after the driver has been removed from the list, read the
> still-valid driver pointer from the device, and access the driver's name
> while bus_remove_driver() proceeds to free the driver structure.
> 
> To close this race window, acquire and immediately release the bus
> drivers klist lock after all devices have been detached. This ensures
> that any in-flight uevent generation that observed the driver pointer
> before device detachment completed finishes reading the driver name
> before the driver structure is destroyed.
> 
> Fixes: 18daa52418e7 ("driver core: fix potential NULL pointer dereference in dev_uevent()")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Extremely unlikely to hit so I would not worry about backporting to
> stable.
> 
>  drivers/base/bus.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> index d17bd91490ee..8b3aaf451e4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> @@ -830,6 +830,15 @@ void bus_remove_driver(struct device_driver *drv)
>  	driver_remove_file(drv, &driver_attr_uevent);
>  	klist_remove(&drv->p->knode_bus);
>  	driver_detach(drv);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure that any concurrent dev_driver_uevent() that observed
> +	 * dev->driver before driver_detach() cleared it, finishes
> +	 * accessing drv->name.
> +	 */
> +	scoped_guard(spinlock, &sp->klist_drivers.k_lock) {
> +	}

Shouldn't the compiler just no-op this away into nothing?

thanks,

greg k-h