Re: [PATCH v4] ntfs: roll back the ACL xattr commit when the WSL mode update fails

From: Hyunchul Lee

Date: Mon Oct 12 2026 - 05:50:43 EST


Hi Hongling,

On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 03:34:52PM +0800, Hongling Zeng wrote:
> ntfs_set_acl_ex() commits the ACL xattr before it rewrites the WSL
> mode EA, and removes it again when the rewrite fails. That only
> undoes a set that created the xattr: when the update replaced or
> removed an existing one, the old ACL is discarded along with the
> failed update. The undo result is discarded and the EA paths record
> no error state, so when it fails too, the new, typically more
> permissive, ACL is left on disk while i_mode, the mode EA and the
> cached ACL keep the old values. Once the stale xattr is loaded again
> after a remount, a chmod 0640 -> 0777 that reported failure leaves
> the file accessible to the relaxed ACL while stat() still reports
> 0640.
>
> Save the previous xattr before committing the update, and restore it
> when the mode EA rewrite fails. A removed xattr is restored by
> creating it again: the removal dropped the entry, and XATTR_REPLACE
> fails with -ENODATA on a missing entry. Remove the new xattr only
> when there was no previous one, and skip the undo when the commit
> changed nothing, e.g. removing an xattr that never existed. Fail
> the update when the previous xattr cannot be read back. A failed
> rollback is still recorded: NVolSetErrors(), which the next
> persistence point persists as VOLUME_IS_DIRTY, and a log message the
> errors= policy acts on. The flag cannot be written to disk here
> directly: the target inode's mrec_lock is held and the $Volume
> mrec_lock cannot be nested under it.
>
> Fixes: fc053f05ca28 ("ntfs: add reparse and ea operations")
> Suggested-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hongling Zeng <zenghongling@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Save the previous ACL xattr before committing the new one and roll
> back to it when the update replaced an existing one, instead of
> removing the new one (suggested by Hyunchul Lee)
> - Fail the update when the previous xattr cannot be read back, and
> restore a zero-length previous xattr without XATTR_REPLACE
> Changes in v4:
> - Undo a removal too: restore the previous xattr by creating it
> again, since the removal dropped the entry
> - Skip the undo when the commit changed nothing, e.g. removing an
> xattr that never existed
> ---
> fs/ntfs/ea.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/ea.c b/fs/ntfs/ea.c
> index 1104fd72cd2a..0577a2adc365 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/ea.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/ea.c
> @@ -1038,8 +1038,10 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> {
> const char *name;
> size_t size, name_len;
> - void *value;
> - int err;
> + void *value, *old_value = NULL;
> + int err, old_len = -ENODATA;
> + bool old_exists = false;
> + bool acl_committed = false;
> int flags;
> umode_t mode;
>
> @@ -1083,7 +1085,40 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> }
>
> mutex_lock(&NTFS_I(inode)->mrec_lock);
> + if (!init_acl) {
> + /*
> + * Save the previous xattr so the update can be
> + * rolled back to it when the mode EA rewrite fails.
> + * A new inode cannot have one yet, and one that
> + * cannot be read back fails the update.
> + */

Could you shorten this comment? I think that the explanations are already
clear from the code.

> + old_len = ntfs_get_ea(inode, name, name_len, NULL, 0);
> + if (old_len >= 0) {
> + old_exists = true;

Could you remove the old_exists? we can use old_len >= 0.

> + /* kmalloc(0) returns the non-NULL ZERO_SIZE_PTR. */
> + old_value = kmalloc(old_len, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!old_value) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + err = ntfs_get_ea(inode, name, name_len,
> + old_value, old_len);
> + if (err != old_len) {
> + kfree(old_value);
> + old_value = NULL;
> + if (err >= 0)
> + err = -EIO;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + } else if (old_len != -ENODATA) {
> + err = old_len;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + }
> err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, value, size, flags, NULL);
> + if (!err)
> + acl_committed = true;
> +out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&NTFS_I(inode)->mrec_lock);
> if (err == -ENODATA && !size)
> err = 0; /* Removing non existed xattr. */
> @@ -1095,8 +1130,54 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> mutex_lock(&NTFS_I(inode)->mrec_lock);
> err = ntfs_ea_set_wsl_inode(inode, 0, &ea_size, NTFS_EA_MODE);
> if (err) {
> - ntfs_set_ea(inode, name, name_len, NULL, 0,
> - XATTR_REPLACE, NULL);
> + if (acl_committed) {
> + int undo_err;
> +
> + if (old_exists) {
> + /*
> + * Restore the previous xattr.
> + * A removal dropped the entry, and
> + * XATTR_REPLACE fails with
> + * -ENODATA on a missing entry, so
> + * create it. A zero-length xattr
> + * cannot be restored with
> + * XATTR_REPLACE, which would
> + * remove it again.
> + */

And I think this comment can be reduced.

> + int undo_flags = acl && old_len ?
> + XATTR_REPLACE : 0;
> +
> + undo_err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name,
> + name_len, old_value,
> + old_len, undo_flags,
> + NULL);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * No xattr existed before the
> + * update, so remove the newly
> + * committed one.
> + */

This branch is self-explanatory from `!old_exists`.

> + undo_err = ntfs_set_ea(inode, name,
> + name_len, NULL, 0,
> + XATTR_REPLACE, NULL);
> + }
> + if (undo_err) {
> + /*
> + * The xattr change is committed
> + * already, so a failed rollback
> + * leaves it on disk while i_mode,
> + * the mode EA and the cached ACL
> + * keep the old values. Record the
> + * error: the next persistence point
> + * persists it as VOLUME_IS_DIRTY.
> + * Run chkdsk.
> + */

Same here.

> + NVolSetErrors(NTFS_I(inode)->vol);
> + ntfs_error(inode->i_sb,
> + "Failed to undo the ACL xattr: %d",
> + undo_err);
> + }
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&NTFS_I(inode)->mrec_lock);
> inode->i_mode = old_mode;
> goto out;
> @@ -1109,6 +1190,7 @@ static noinline int ntfs_set_acl_ex(struct mnt_idmap *idmap,
> }
>
> out:
> + kfree(old_value);
> kfree(value);
>
> return err;
> --
> 2.25.1
>

--
Thanks,
Hyunchul