Re: [PATCH 1/2] agents: add infrastructure for agent resources

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 10:22:44AM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 10:20:04AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > +AGENT RESOURCES
> > > > +M:	Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > +L:	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > +S:	Maintained
> > > > +F:	agents/
> > > 
> > > If you choose a separate entry instead of adding this to the existing
> > > "Documentation Process" entry, let's update the mailing list to
> > > workflows@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. This is where all process changes are announced.
> > 
> > Hm... What do you think Konstantin?
> > 
> > I remember the workflows@ list was originally created to share our
> > secret/magical workflows, and I'm not sure that this one qualifies. We can
> > start a new list too if it's easier.
> 
> Eh. At this point I'm trying to shove everyone towards "just use dfn: queries
> for your stuff, stop relying on actual 'lists'". I'd just leave it as
> linux-kernel@vger, honestly, since the automated patch churn may annoy those
> people on the workflows list that we actually want to keep there.

Konstantin,

The "Documentation Process" entry already points to the workflow@ mailing list.
Changes proposed in "AGENT RESOURCES" will affect everyone, so sending such
important patches to LKML (/dev/null) does not seem right to me.

Thanks

> 
> -K