Re: [PATCH v8 05/25] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move hitless machinery to common code

[Mostafa Saleh]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 12:59:28PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 01:12:38PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> > Move the hitless STE functions to the common file so it can be
> > reused by the hypervisor.
> 
> s/it/they

Will do.

> 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> With some nits:
> 
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -59,10 +59,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_msi_index {
> >  	ARM_SMMU_MAX_MSIS,
> >  };
> >  
> > -#define NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS 8
> >  static_assert(sizeof(struct arm_smmu_ste) == NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS * sizeof(u64));
> >  static_assert(sizeof(struct arm_smmu_cd) == NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS * sizeof(u64));
> > -
> >  static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_msi_cfg[ARM_SMMU_MAX_MSIS][3] = {
> 
> This line removal seems unnecessary.

Yes, I will fix it.

> 
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > @@ -1321,6 +1316,8 @@ static inline u64 arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_enc(u8 num, u8 scale)
> >  		FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_TLBI_0_SCALE, scale & 0x1f);
> >  }
> >  
> > +#define NUM_ENTRY_QWORDS 8
> > +
> 
> Maybe we should drop the duplicated define in arm-smmu-v3-test.c?

Makes sense, will do.

Thanks,
Mostafa

> 
> Nicolin