Re: [PATCH V5 0/4] arm64: dts: freescale: Add chargebyte Charge Control Y

[Stefan Wahren]

Hi Frank,
hi Vinod,

Am 21.09.26 um 16:46 schrieb Frank Li:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 03:09:23PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > Am 07.09.26 um 17:04 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> > > This series adds support for the chargebyte Charge Control Y, which is
> > > an Electrical Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) for MCS (Megawatt
> > > Charging System) charging stations.
> > >
> > > sashiko reported in the first version of the series [1] that X_nRST_LAN
> > > is available via GPIO line names, but there is no reset mechanismn in the
> > > device tree. This finding is valid. Since the reset line feature isn't
> > > implemented for LAN8651 driver yet, I like to proceed with the current
> > > version. The LAN8651 handles reset via SPI commands and in rare cases
> > > we still have the possibility to control the reset from userspace.
> > > Btw the pin has a pull resistor in hardware, so it's not floating.
> > >
> > > sashiko complained in the fourth version of the series [2] about the
> > > reset polarity of ethphy2 and the different drive strength across the
> > > data lines. Both is intended.
> > >
> > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260818093147.E556C1F000E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260903082122.A777C1F000E9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Changes in V5:
> > > - fix delete-node for pinctrl_leds (reported by sashiko)
> > > - add Krzysztof's Reviewed-by
> > I didn't received any feedback for V5 yet. Do you have any comments or could
> > it be merged?
> Wait for vinod pick phy binding part.
@Vinod are you fine with both PHY bindings?

@Frank I noticed that this patch has a conflict with the Makefile in 
linux-next. Should I rebase or do you resolve the conflict?

Best regards
> Frank
>
> > Best regards