Re: [PATCH net v3] rust: net: netlink: validate attribute length before casting to `c_int`

[Alice Ryhl]

On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 10:07 AM Sagar Taunk <sagartaunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Should I resend it after rebasing it or would this be fine as is ?

Please resend targeting 'net-next' instead of 'net' and resend with a
rebase. Thanks!

Also, please read the guidelines on top-posting:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#use-trimmed-interleaved-replies-in-email-discussions

> -------- Original Message --------
> On Tuesday, 09/22/26 at 19:12 Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 3:36 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/22/26 04:31, Sagar Taunk wrote:
> > > Hello, are there any updates for this?
> > >
> > > Also, I wanted to ask is it fine if I keep fixing stuff pointed out by sashiko for now ? (I.e pre-existing issues pointed out by it in other's patches or should I ask the original authors of it first ?)
> > Does not apply cleanly to net. Since a repost is needed, you must
> > also avoid empty lines in the tag area (i.e. after the fixes tag).
> >
> > WRT sashiko-reported issues, beyond be aware of false-positives,
> > generally speaking net-next is the preferred target tree (i.e. no
> > or very limited impact, very old issue, etc...) with no fixes tag.
> >
> > Focusing on high stakes changes would be appreciated.
>
> From my perspective there's no issue in landing this through net-next
> instead of net, as it's not urgent.
>
> Alice
>