Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Johannes Weiner]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 04:56:48AM -1000, Chris Li wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:43 AM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > People can speak for themselves and suggest other time slots. You do not speak
> > for anyone but yourself here. At this point this is derailing the conversation.
> >
> 
> I am expressing my opinion, freedom of speech. As you can see in the
> previous discussion, Baoquan wasn't able to join that time slot. He is
> a major shareholder in XSwap. I worry that alignment vswap vs xswap
> without Baoquan is ineffective. That is my opinion.

Actually, he said he is not sure if he can make it, and before Nhat
could respond to that soft push you drew a hard line without actually
proposing a workable alternative that made Nhat give up instead.

So my free speech opinion is the same as Shakeel's: you're speaking
for others and thereby derailing efforts to align on something.

We all want Baoquan in the room.