Re: Path forward for Virtualized Swap?

[Shakeel Butt]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 03:38:38AM -1000, Chris Li wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 8:56 AM Nhat Pham <nphamcs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 11:50 PM Chris Li <chrisl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > No that time slot is too late for Asia developers. I don't think we
> > > should use that time slot for swap alignment.
> > >
> > > We should find a time slot more friendly to Asia.
> >
> > Any time slot would have that kind of problem. We're spread out across
> > the globe.
> >
> > Let's just use a standardized time slot we have for MM alignment sessions.
> 
> There are more swap maintainers in Asia than in the US + Europe, at
> least based on the maintainer file. Please be more inclusive. If the
> alignment is done without key stakeholders, it miss the point.
> 
> Sigh, we can't even align on a time slot.
> 
> In that case, let's keep discussing on the mailing list. At least it
> is accessible to every one.

People can speak for themselves and suggest other time slots. You do not speak
for anyone but yourself here. At this point this is derailing the conversation.