Re: [PATCH] kho: fix global scratch size calculation

[sashiko-bot]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] kho: lowmem scratch exhaustion due to missing node-specific lowmem reservations
--

commit 45b67db1813edaa6fb1bdfe7033f0598a814cd63
Author: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

kho: fix global scratch size calculation

This commit updates the scratch size calculations to correctly distinguish
between memory reserved for a specific NUMA node and memory reserved with
NUMA_NO_NODE. It introduces memblock_reserved_size_nid() to calculate
reserved memory based on reservation type and NUMA node, fixing an issue
where per-node reservations were incorrectly included in the global scratch
allocation.

> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> index 7c4d86daf86d5..dc809e1e768c0 100644
> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -787,17 +787,17 @@ static void __init scratch_size_update(void)
>  	if (scratch_scale) {
>  		phys_addr_t size;
>  
> -		size = memblock_reserved_kern_size(ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
> -						   NUMA_NO_NODE);
> -		size -= memblock_reserved_hugetlb_size(ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT,
> -						       NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +		size = memblock_reserved_size_nid(ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> +						  MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN);

[Severity: High]
Does checking NUMA_NO_NODE here exclude node-specific lowmem reservations
(like node-bound DMA pools) from the lowmem scratch size calculation?

If the successor kernel requires lowmem for these node-specific reservations
during early boot, could shrinking the global lowmem scratch memory lead to
memblock allocation failures and a panic?

> +		size -= memblock_reserved_size_nid(ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT, NUMA_NO_NODE,
> +						   MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB);
>  		size = size * scratch_scale / 100;
>  		scratch_size_lowmem = size;
[ ... ]
> @@ -815,11 +815,11 @@ static phys_addr_t __init scratch_size_node(int nid)
>  	phys_addr_t size;
>  
>  	if (scratch_scale) {
> -		size = memblock_reserved_kern_size(MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE,
> -						   nid);
> +		size = memblock_reserved_size_nid(MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE, nid,
> +						  MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN);

[Severity: High]
Are the node-specific lowmem reservations that were excluded from
scratch_size_lowmem now being counted here instead? Since this counts
with MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE, will these reservations potentially be satisfied
using scratch memory in highmem?

If the successor kernel restricts its memblock allocations to
MEMBLOCK_KHO_SCRATCH regions, won't it be unable to recreate its
node-specific lowmem reservations if the per-node scratch memory was placed
in highmem?

>  		/* Do not count HugeTLB pages. */
> -		size -= memblock_reserved_hugetlb_size(MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE,
> -						       nid);
> +		size -= memblock_reserved_size_nid(MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE, nid,
> +						   MEMBLOCK_RSRV_HUGETLB);
>  		size = size * scratch_scale / 100;
>  	} else {
>  		size = scratch_size_pernode;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922131217.698809-1-sourabhjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?part=1