Re: [RESEND v7 06/29] s390: mm: add PMD swap-exclusive helpers

From: Usama Arif

Date: Tue Sep 22 2026 - 09:10:46 EST




On 18/09/2026 22:41, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 9/14/26 14:27, Usama Arif wrote:
>> A later patch keeps a PMD-mapped anonymous THP mapped by a PMD across the
>> swap round-trip, so PG_anon_exclusive now has to survive in a swap PMD and
>> not just in a swap PTE.
>>
>> s390 is the one architecture where a swap PMD is not a swap PTE in
>> disguise: it is an RSTE with its own layout, converted to a fake PTE swap
>> entry for the common code. Give it its own exclusive bit rather than
>> borrowing the PTE-format macro. The two happen to have the same value, but
>> that is a coincidence. Bit 52 was documented as unused; document what it
>> is now.
>>
>> Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> index 2d5c2ab06de98..0790a0884cfab 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
>> @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ void setup_protection_map(void);
>> /* Common bits in region and segment table entries, for swap entries */
>> #define _RST_ENTRY_COMM 0x0010 /* Common-Region/Segment, marks swap entry */
>> #define _RST_ENTRY_INVALID 0x0020 /* invalid region/segment table entry */
>> +#define _RST_ENTRY_SWP_EXCLUSIVE 0x0800 /* SW exclusive swap bit, see mk_swap_rste() */
>>
>> #define _CRST_ENTRIES 2048 /* number of region/segment table entries */
>> #define _PAGE_ENTRIES 256 /* number of page table entries */
>> @@ -859,6 +860,28 @@ static inline pte_t pte_swp_clear_exclusive(pte_t pte)
>> return clear_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(_PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMD_SOFTLEAVES
>> +/*
>> + * A PMD swap entry is an RSTE, not a PTE, so it needs its own exclusive bit
>> + * rather than the PTE-format _PAGE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE. The two happen to have the
>> + * same value; see the RSTE swap layout above mk_swap_rste().
>> + */
>
> I'm not sure the documentation here is warranted. It's all documented above
> above __SWP_OFFSET_MASK_RSTE, no? I'd just extend the documentation there and
> keep it away from these helpers that just use the bit.
>
> The fact that they use the same bit doesn't really matter.

Ack, dropped for next revision.

>
>> +static inline pmd_t pmd_swp_mkexclusive(pmd_t pmd)
>> +{
>> + return set_pmd_bit(pmd, __pgprot(_RST_ENTRY_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline bool pmd_swp_exclusive(pmd_t pmd)
>> +{
>> + return pmd_val(pmd) & _RST_ENTRY_SWP_EXCLUSIVE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline pmd_t pmd_swp_clear_exclusive(pmd_t pmd)
>> +{
>> + return clear_pmd_bit(pmd, __pgprot(_RST_ENTRY_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
>> +}
>> +#endif
>
> I guess we could move it above the pmd_swp_soft_dirty() stuff in the same
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PMD_SOFTLEAVES block.
>

Done for the next revision.
>> +
>> static inline int pte_soft_dirty(pte_t pte)
>> {
>> return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY;
>> @@ -1900,15 +1923,16 @@ static inline swp_entry_t __swp_entry(unsigned long type, unsigned long offset)
>> * Bits 59 and 63 are used to indicate the swap entry. Bit 58 marks the rste
>> * as invalid.
>> * A swap entry is indicated by bit pattern (rste & 0x011) == 0x010
>> - * | offset |Xtype |11TT|S0|
>> + * | offset |Etype |11TT|S0|
>> * |0000000000111111111122222222223333333333444444444455|555555|5566|66|
>> * |0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901|234567|8901|23|
>> *
>> * Bits 0-51 store the offset.
>> + * Bit 52 (E) is used to remember PG_anon_exclusive
>> + * (_RST_ENTRY_SWP_EXCLUSIVE), mirroring bit 52 of a swap pte.
>> * Bits 53-57 store the type.
>> * Bit 62 (S) is used for softdirty tracking.
>> * Bits 60-61 (TT) indicate the table type: 0x01 for REGION3 and 0x00 for SEGMENT.
>> - * Bit 52 (X) is unused.
>> */
>>
>> #define __SWP_OFFSET_MASK_RSTE ((1UL << 52) - 1)
>
> IIRC, __pmd_to_swp_entry() and __swp_entry_to_pmd() will lose the flag, which is
> the right thing to do.
>
> So conceptually LGTM.
>

Thanks for all the reviews!