Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Add FFA_FN64_MEM_RECLAIM2 function ID

[Snehal Koukuntla]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 04:58:41PM +0000, sashiko-bot wrote:
> [Severity: Low]
> Does the missing 32-bit counterpart for FFA_FN64_MEM_RECLAIM2 break
> FFA_FN_NATIVE() compatibility on 32-bit architectures?
> 
> Every other FFA_FN64_ prefix in the header has a 32-bit counterpart. If
> FFA_FN_NATIVE(MEM_RECLAIM2) is ever used on a 32-bit build, it will evaluate
> to FFA_MEM_RECLAIM2 due to the architecture-conditional logic, which does
> not exist here, and would cause a compilation failure.
> 
> For 64-bit exclusive ABIs like FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_REQ2, the convention
> is to omit the FN64_ prefix entirely.

Ack, I will rename this to FFA_MEM_RECLAIM2 in v2 to follow the existing
convention for 64-bit-only ABIs in arm_ffa.h.

Thanks,
Snehal