Re: [PATCH] rust: clk: document overflow panics in `Hertz` constructors

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 5:51 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My understanding is that the "default" way patches land is that the
> subsystem also takes Rust patches related to the subsystem, and that
> the rust tree is a fallback tree.

Indeed, the idea on how we suggest setting up the `MAINTAINERS`
entries is that, by default, maintainers keep control of both sides
(they are the experts, after all) and that, hopefully, they get more
involved on the Rust side etc.

It makes sense for reworking the subsystem, too, since it may happen
that a rework on the C side may need adjustments on the Rust side etc.

The file is already under "COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK", so in this instance
it seems fine.

Brian: in case you want it (but it wouldn't be needed!):

Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>

As Alexandre said, we may want to rework how these work (instead of
panicking), but documenting helps for now (and whether this counts as
a Fix or not is, I guess, up to what you usually do in your
subsystem).

I hope that helps!

Cheers,
Miguel