Re: [PATCH] nfc: st95hf: validate device-reported response length before reading
From: David Heidelberg
Date: Sun Sep 20 2026 - 19:02:39 EST
On 19/08/2026 16:55, Tianchu Chen wrote:
From: Tianchu Chen <flynnnchen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
st95hf_spi_recv_response() reads a 2-byte header from the device,
derives the total response length from it (up to 1025 bytes via the
long-frame encoding) and then blindly reads len - 2 more bytes into
the caller's buffer, whose size it knows nothing about.
Call sites can be overflowed by a device reporting a large length,
for example, st95hf_irq_thread_handler() passes the data area of a
280-byte skb.
ST95HF datasheet states "In Reader mode it is possible to receive up to
528 bytes of frame data from VICC and TypeB cards", so technically a bogus
NFC tag may trigger the OOB-write if the card-reader's firmware allows
large packets.
Add a buff_len parameter and reject a device-reported length that does
not fit into the caller's buffer before issuing the second SPI
transfer. Also modify callers to pass their real buffer sizes.
Discovered by Atuin - Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine.
Fixes: cab47333f0f75 ("NFC: Add STMicroelectronics ST95HF driver")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Tianchu Chen <flynnnchen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 6 ++++--
drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/nfc/st95hf/spi.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Hello Tianchu,
please check and address the Sashiko output.
Thank you
David
[ ... ]
> @@ -106,6 +106,11 @@ int st95hf_spi_recv_response(struct st95hf_spi_context *spicontext,
> else
> len += receivebuff[1];
>
> + if (len > buff_len) {
> + mutex_unlock(&spicontext->spi_lock);
> + return -E2BIG;
> + }
> +
Does this early return path leave the spi chip select (CS) permanently
asserted?
The first spi transfer uses .cs_change = 1 to keep the chip select active.
Skipping the second transfer would prevent the chip select from being
deasserted, potentially deadlocking the device.
> /* Now make a transfer to read only relevant bytes */
> tx_takedata.rx_buf = &receivebuff[2];
> tx_takedata.len = len - 2;