Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/5] mm: Add copy_remote_mm_str()

[David Hildenbrand (Arm)]

On 9/18/26 11:13, Anastasios Papagiannis wrote:
>> AI has a point, declarations in mm.h are not guarded by #ifdef
>> CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL, no? These look generic, I'd remove BPF_SYSCALL
>> guard
> 
> Yes, this sounds reasonable. I have removed the #ifdefs in v8 [1].
> 
> CC David, who proposed removing the #ifdefs from the header file in [2],
> and Lorenzo, who has already acked the patch.

No string opinion, fine with me.

-- 
Cheers,

David