Re: [PATCH] mux: convert to use fwnode interface

[Fabio Forni]

> On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 09:35:21PM +0200, Fabio Forni via B4 Relay wrote:
> > @@ -821,23 +825,23 @@ static struct mux_state *__devm_mux_state_get(struct device *dev, const char *mu
> >   }
> >   
> >   /**
> > - * devm_mux_state_get_from_np() - Get the mux-state for a device, with resource
> > + * devm_mux_state_get_from_swnode() - Get the mux-state for a device, with resource
> >    *				  management.
> >    * @dev: The device that needs a mux-control.
> >    * @mux_name: The name identifying the mux-control.
> > - * @np: the device nodes, use dev->of_node if it is NULL.
> > + * @node: the device nodes, use dev's fwnode if it is NULL.
> >    *
> >    * Return: Pointer to the mux-state, or an ERR_PTR with a negative errno.
> >    *
> >    * The mux-state will automatically be freed on release.
> >    */
> >   struct mux_state *
> > -devm_mux_state_get_from_np(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name,
> > -			   struct device_node *np)
> > +devm_mux_state_get_from_swnode(struct device *dev, const char *mux_name,
> > +			       struct fwnode_handle *node)
>
> Shouldn't it be get_from_fwnode (not swnode)?

Yes, it's definitely a lapsus, good catch. I'll fix it.