Re: [PATCH v5 09/14] gtrace: Add RISC-V Trace ramsink driver

From: Zane Leung

Date: Wed Sep 16 2026 - 05:20:32 EST


On 8/10/2026 11:22 PM, Mayuresh Chitale wrote:

> +static size_t rvtrace_ramsink_copyto_auxbuf(struct gtrace_component *comp,
> + struct gtrace_perf_auxbuf *buf,
> + u64 *format)
> +{
> + struct rvtrace_ramsink_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&comp->dev);
> + struct trace_buf src, dst;
> + u32 wp_low, wp_high;
> + size_t bytes = 0;
> + bool wrap;
> + u64 wp;
> +
> + dst.base = buf->base;
> + dst.len = buf->length;
> + dst.cur = buf->pos;
> + src.base = priv->va;
> + src.len = priv->size;
> + wp_low = gtrace_read32(comp->pdata, RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPLOW_OFF);
> + wp_high = gtrace_read32(comp->pdata, RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPHIGH_OFF);
> + wp = (u64)(wp_high) << 32 | wp_low;
> + wrap = wp & RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPLOW_WRAP;
> + wp &= ~RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPLOW_WRAP;
> + if (wrap) {
> + gtrace_write32(comp->pdata, lower_32_bits(priv->start),
> + RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPLOW_OFF);
> + gtrace_write32(comp->pdata, upper_32_bits(priv->start),
> + RVTRACE_RAMSINK_WPHIGH_OFF);
> + src.cur = wp - priv->start;
> + priv->prev_wp = priv->start;
> + /*
> + * There is no way to tell if trRamWp wrapped around more than once. As a
> + * result priv->prev_wp can't be used and the entire buffer must be copied
> + * even though some data might be duplicated.
> + */
> + bytes = priv->size;
> + } else {
> + src.cur = priv->prev_wp - priv->start;
> + bytes = wp - priv->prev_wp;
> + priv->prev_wp = wp;
> + }
> +
> + tbuf_to_pbuf_copy(&src, &dst, bytes);
> + dev_dbg(&comp->dev, "Copied %zu bytes\n", bytes);
> + *format = PERF_AUX_FLAG_GTRACE_FORMAT_ETRACE;
> + return bytes;
> +}

If the discovery of trace parameters is delegated to the user-space decoder according to the cover

letter, why are we explicitly setting PERF_AUX_FLAG_GTRACE_FORMAT_ETRACE here? Taking a step back,

the trace format should be determined by the  trTeControl's traceFormat rather than being hardcoded.