Re: [PATCH] Docs/damon: add TLB flush policy document

[SeongJae Park]

Hi Kunwu and Lian,

On Fri,  5 Jun 2026 11:10:08 +0800 Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> DAMON avoids TLB flushes after clearing PTE Accessed bits for sampling.
> The overhead was measured and found significant [1].  Production
> workloads with large working sets flush TLB buffers naturally, so
> accuracy impact is negligible.
> 
> On systems with large TLB buffers and small test workloads, stale TLB
> entries persist across sampling intervals and produce false negatives.
> This comes up repeatedly on the mailing list and in private inquiries
> [2][3].
> 
> Add a document on the design decision, trade-offs, test environment
> problems, and recommendations.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20200403103059.12762-1-sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260117020731.226785-3-sj@xxxxxxxxxx [2]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260526145034.91594-1-sj@xxxxxxxxxx [3]

Thank you for this great patch!

> 
> Co-developed-by: Wang Lian <lianux.mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Lian <lianux.mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst     |   1 +
>  Documentation/mm/damon/tlb_flush.rst | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 132 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/damon/tlb_flush.rst
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst
> index 318f6a7bfea4..5e239437dab3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/damon/index.rst
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ DAMON is a Linux kernel subsystem for efficient :ref:`data access monitoring
>  
>     faq
>     design
> +   tlb_flush
>     api
>     maintainer-profile
>  
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/damon/tlb_flush.rst b/Documentation/mm/damon/tlb_flush.rst
> new file mode 100644
[...]

Great document!  That said, it feels like a good complete article or a paper,
rather than DAMON documentation that pursue to be short and essential.  I feel
like this fit more to be published in a blog like DAMON project blog [1], or
news site like LWN.  If you'd like to, please feel free to upload a PR or send
patch for DAMON project blog source [2].

Mainly due to the verbosity, as I above mentionedd, I'm not sure if the current
shape of this patch is the best to be merged as is.  I also find the background
part of the document is a kind of duplicate of some information in design.rst.
What about putting only essential information in a condensed way on the
design.rst?

[1] https://damonitor.github.io/site_about
[2] https://github.com/damonitor/damonitor.github.io/tree/master/blog_src


Thanks,
SJ

[...]