[PATCH 2/2] KVM: LoongArch: selftests: Add FPU test case
From: Bibo Mao
Date: Thu Jun 04 2026 - 05:11:45 EST
Add FPU test case and verify FPU register get and set APIs, the
FPU width supports 64/128/256 bits.
Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
.../selftests/kvm/loongarch/fpu_test.c | 144 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/loongarch/fpu_test.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
index 9118a5a51b89..7d11592b3759 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.kvm
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += rseq_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_riscv += steal_time
TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch = loongarch/pmu_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += loongarch/fpu_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += arch_timer
TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += coalesced_io_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_loongarch += demand_paging_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/loongarch/fpu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/loongarch/fpu_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..459996286c83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/loongarch/fpu_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "loongarch/processor.h"
+
+struct kvm_fpureg vector = {{1, 2, 3, 4 }};
+
+static void guest_code(void)
+{
+ unsigned long val;
+ struct kvm_fpureg *fp = &vector;
+
+ val = csr_read(LOONGARCH_CSR_EUEN);
+ csr_write(val | 7, LOONGARCH_CSR_EUEN);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("fld.d $f0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) :);
+ GUEST_SYNC(0);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("vld $vr0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) : );
+ GUEST_SYNC(1);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("xvld $xr0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) :);
+ GUEST_SYNC(2);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("fst.d $f0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) : "memory");
+ GUEST_SYNC(3);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("vst $vr0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) : "memory");
+ GUEST_SYNC(4);
+
+ __asm__ __volatile__("xvst $xr0, %0, 0\n" : : "r"(fp) : "memory");
+ GUEST_SYNC(5);
+
+ GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct ucall uc;
+ int cont;
+
+ cont = 1;
+ while (cont) {
+ vcpu_run(vcpu);
+
+ switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+ case UCALL_PRINTF:
+ printf("%s", (const char *)uc.buffer);
+ break;
+ case UCALL_DONE:
+ printf("FPU test PASSED\n");
+ case UCALL_SYNC:
+ cont = 0;
+ break;
+ case UCALL_ABORT:
+ REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
+ default:
+ TEST_ASSERT(false, "Unexpected exit: %s",
+ exit_reason_str(vcpu->run->exit_reason));
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static bool __vm_has_feature(struct kvm_vm *vm, int feature)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = __kvm_has_device_attr(vm->fd, KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_CTRL, feature);
+ return !ret;
+}
+
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ struct kvm_vm *vm;
+ struct kvm_fpu fpu;
+ struct kvm_fpureg *fp = &vector;
+
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+ __TEST_REQUIRE(__vm_has_feature(vm, KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_LSX),
+ "LSX not available, skipping test\n");
+ __TEST_REQUIRE(__vm_has_feature(vm, KVM_LOONGARCH_VM_FEAT_LASX),
+ "LASX not available, skipping test\n");
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ sync_global_from_guest(vm, *fp);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 8), "Wanted 0x%llx from f0, got 0x%llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[0]);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 16), "Wanted 0x%llx %llx from vr0, got 0x%llx %llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fp->val64[1],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[1]);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 32),
+ "Wanted 0x%llx %llx %llx %llx from xr0, got 0x%llx %llx %llx %llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fp->val64[1], fp->val64[2], fp->val64[3],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[1],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[2], fpu.fpr[0].val64[3]);
+
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0] += 0x10;
+ vcpu_fpu_set(vcpu, &fpu);
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ sync_global_from_guest(vm, *fp);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 8), "Wanted 0x%llx from f0, got 0x%llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[0]);
+
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0] += 0x10;
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[1] += 0x10;
+ vcpu_fpu_set(vcpu, &fpu);
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ sync_global_from_guest(vm, *fp);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 16), "Wanted 0x%llx %llx from vr0, got 0x%llx %llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fp->val64[1],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[1]);
+
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0] += 0x10;
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[1] += 0x10;
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[2] += 0x10;
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[3] += 0x10;
+ vcpu_fpu_set(vcpu, &fpu);
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ vcpu_fpu_get(vcpu, &fpu);
+ sync_global_from_guest(vm, *fp);
+ TEST_ASSERT(!memcmp(fpu.fpr, fp, 32),
+ "Wanted 0x%llx %llx %llx %llx from xr0, got 0x%llx %llx %llx %llx",
+ fp->val64[0], fp->val64[1], fp->val64[2], fp->val64[3],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[0], fpu.fpr[0].val64[1],
+ fpu.fpr[0].val64[2], fpu.fpr[0].val64[3]);
+
+ run_vcpu(vcpu);
+ kvm_vm_free(vm);
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.39.3