Re: [PATCH v2] clk: keystone: don't cache clock rate

From: Nishanth Menon

Date: Wed Jun 03 2026 - 12:13:01 EST


On 12:16-20260512, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 10:51-20260512, Brian Masney wrote:
> > Hi Nishanth,
> > > Could you clarify if I need to take it via my tree to arnd or if this
> > > patch will go via the clk tree?
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not sure what Stephen prefers here. An argument could be made
> > for either approach. I would just go with whatever you have done in the
> > past.
>
> Thanks Brian for the review.
>
> This usually will go via Stephen. Will wait, just trying to make sure
> there is no change in expectations (given this patch missed a window).
>

Stephen, I'd like to clarify: would you pick this patch up directly,
or would like me to send you a PR after collecting sci_clk patches? I am
OK with either, would prefer to not have wrong expectations.

I see two patches pending to be queued:
* this one
* https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20260512110028.2999471-1-nm@xxxxxx/

--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
https://ti.com/opensource