Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] sh: mach-rsk: rsk7203: use static device properties for LEDs and GPIO buttons

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 04:52:37PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 02:45:34AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 03:06:14PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 01:02:56AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 10:13:19PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

...

> > > > > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rsk7203_devices); i++) {
> > > > 
> > > > 	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rsk7203_devices); i++) {
> > > > 
> > > > ...and drop the above definition of i.
> > > 
> > > Why? I do not see coding style suggesting this. 
> > 
> > Linus Torvalds.
> 
> Context matters.
> 
> If you want this to be a universal requirement work on adding this to
> coding style and to checkpatch. Otherwise declaring loop iterator inside
> the loop can be beneficial but in many cases it does not really matter
> and can be left to the code author and the revealing style for the
> affected code area.

>From the common sense perspective this makes code shorter and isolated, which
is a good thing as it makes it robust against wrong re-use of the iterator
variable.

Anyway, I replied already with a link.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko