Re: [PATCH 02/28] KVM: x86/mmu: remove SPTE_PERM_MASK
From: mlevitsk
Date: Tue Jun 02 2026 - 10:28:22 EST
On Tue, 2026-05-05 at 21:52 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Jon Kohler <jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> SPTE_PERM_MASK is no longer referenced by anything in the kernel.
It might be worth adding a note saying that this macro has been unused for a long time.
(to help with backports)
The last commit that referenced it was this one, if I am not mistaken:
commit 1441ca1494d74a2c9d6c9bd8dd633d9ebff1daba
Author: Junaid Shahid <junaids@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Jul 22 19:43:16 2022 -0700
kvm: x86: mmu: Drop the need_remote_flush() function
This is only used by kvm_mmu_pte_write(), which no longer actually
creates the new SPTE and instead just clears the old SPTE. So we
just need to check if the old SPTE was shadow-present instead of
calling need_remote_flush(). Hence we can drop this function. It was
incomplete anyway as it didn't take access-tracking into account.
This patch should not result in any functional change.
Signed-off-by: Junaid Shahid <junaids@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-Id: <20220723024316.2725328-1-junaids@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Kohler <jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20251223054806.1611168-3-jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: David Riley <d.riley@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> index 91ce29fd6f1b..28086fa86fe0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> @@ -42,9 +42,6 @@ static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED == 0);
> #define SPTE_BASE_ADDR_MASK (((1ULL << 52) - 1) & ~(u64)(PAGE_SIZE-1))
> #endif
>
> -#define SPTE_PERM_MASK (PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_user_mask \
> - | shadow_x_mask | shadow_nx_mask | shadow_me_mask)
> -
> #define ACC_EXEC_MASK 1
> #define ACC_WRITE_MASK PT_WRITABLE_MASK
> #define ACC_USER_MASK PT_USER_MASK
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky