Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ocfs2: reject dinodes with non-canonical i_mode type

[Joel Becker]

On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 07:04:02AM -0400, Michael Bommarito wrote:
> ocfs2_validate_inode_block() currently accepts any non-zero i_mode value.
> ocfs2_populate_inode() then copies that mode verbatim into inode->i_mode
> and dispatches on i_mode & S_IFMT to the file/dir/symlink/special_file
> iops; an unrecognised type falls through to ocfs2_special_file_iops and
> init_special_inode().
> 
> Reject dinodes whose type bits do not name one of the seven canonical
> POSIX file types.  Use fs_umode_to_ftype(), the same generic file-type
> conversion helper OCFS2 already uses for directory entries, so the
> accepted inode type set matches the kernel file-type vocabulary instead
> of open-coding a local switch.
> 
> Apply the same structural check to the online filecheck read path.
> filecheck keeps its own error namespace, so it reports malformed i_mode
> through the filecheck logger and OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO instead
> of calling ocfs2_error(), but it must not allow a malformed dinode to
> proceed into ocfs2_populate_inode().
> 
> Fixes: b657c95c1108 ("ocfs2: Wrap inode block reads in a dedicated function.")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517111015.3187935-1-michael.bommarito%40gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@xxxxxxxxx>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7

Reviewed-by: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Side question: What "Assistance" did Claude provide?  Was the snippet
generated entirely by prompt?  No objection, just curious about the
workflow you're using.

Thanks,
Joel

-- 

"Born under a bad sign.
 I been down since I began to crawl.
 If it wasn't for bad luck,
 I wouldn't have no luck at all."

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx