Re: [PATCH 0/9] netconsole: stop charging every netpoll user for netconsole-only state

Next message: Andrew Jeffery: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Meta Rainiera6 BMC support"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH v5] mm/alloc_tag: replace fixed-size early PFN array with dynamic linked list"
In reply to: Breno Leitao: "[PATCH 8/9] netconsole: move remote_port from struct netpoll to netconsole_target"
Next in thread: Breno Leitao: "Re: [PATCH 0/9] netconsole: stop charging every netpoll user for netconsole-only state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Jakub Kicinski

Date: Tue May 26 2026 - 22:01:53 EST

On Sun, 24 May 2026 09:12:16 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> struct netpoll is shared by every netpoll consumer in the tree:
> bonding, bridge, team, vlan, macvlan, dsa and netconsole. The non-
> netconsole users only need a per-port handle that lets them transmit
> SKBs.

Are any of the Sashiko reports real?
At least one seems legit (parallel device and target removal).
If yes we should probably try to fix them before we shuffle the code
around?