Re: [PATCH 0/2] proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock

[Christian Brauner]

On Mon, 18 May 2026 18:35:14 +0200, Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> (checkpatch complains about missing argument names in
> proc_op::proc_get_link, but that was already the case before my patch.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Hm, not super nice as this may cause performance regressions but I think
you're right otherwise. While mostly info leaks - as you mentioned
elsewhere - it would still be nice to try and fix them. So if we can do
it without anyone noticing perf regressions it's probably worth it.

-- 
Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>