Re: [PATCH 0/5] ASoC: AMD: ACP7.x initial PCI driver bring-up

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, 07 May 2026 23:41:28 +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> ASoC: AMD: ACP7.x initial PCI driver bring-up
> 
> This series adds initial AMD ACP 7.x support for ACP7.D / 7.E / 7.F
> platforms.
> 
> Compared to earlier ACP generations, ACP7.x includes substantial design
> changes, including an updated register set/layout. For that reason,
> the ACP7.x implementation is placed under a separate sound/soc/amd/acp7x/
> directory instead of extending older-generation code paths,
> keeping ACP7.x-specific logic and register definitions cleanly separated
> and easier to maintain.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-7.2

Thanks!

[1/5] include: sound: add register header file for acp7.x series
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/44d16948af55
[2/5] ASoC: amd: acp7x: add ACP PCI driver probe/remove sequence
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/1da6f798eda8
[3/5] ASoC: amd: acp7x: add helper functions and hw ops
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/b5a2fdc5e7d2
[4/5] ASoC: amd: enable acp7.x drivers build
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/533308171bf2
[5/5] ASoC: amd: acp7x: add system and runtime PM ops
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/07d56a83ba70

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark