Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] staging: rtl8723bs: fix lines ending in parentheses in hal/sdio_halinit.c

From: Greg KH

Date: Fri May 22 2026 - 01:19:27 EST


On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 02:56:04PM +0200, Artur Ugnivenko wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warnings on lines that end in patentheses in
> hal/sdio_halinit.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Ugnivenko <artur.ugnivenko@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c | 49 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> index e6570fa2e8fd..494fb74ad44f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ u8 _InitPowerOn_8723BS(struct adapter *padapter)
> rtw_write8(padapter, REG_CR, 0x00);
> /* Enable MAC DMA/WMAC/SCHEDULE/SEC block */
> value16 = rtw_read16(padapter, REG_CR);
> - value16 |= (
> + value16 |=
> HCI_TXDMA_EN |
> HCI_RXDMA_EN |
> TXDMA_EN |
> @@ -82,8 +82,7 @@ u8 _InitPowerOn_8723BS(struct adapter *padapter)
> PROTOCOL_EN |
> SCHEDULE_EN |
> ENSEC |
> - CALTMR_EN
> - );
> + CALTMR_EN;

The original () is ok to keep.

> rtw_write16(padapter, REG_CR, value16);
>
> hal_btcoex_PowerOnSetting(padapter);
> @@ -188,15 +187,13 @@ static void _InitTxBufferBoundary(struct adapter *padapter)
> rtw_write8(padapter, REG_TDECTRL + 1, txpktbuf_bndy);
> }
>
> -static void _InitNormalChipRegPriority(
> - struct adapter *Adapter,
> - u16 beQ,
> - u16 bkQ,
> - u16 viQ,
> - u16 voQ,
> - u16 mgtQ,
> - u16 hiQ
> -)
> +static void _InitNormalChipRegPriority(struct adapter *Adapter,
> + u16 beQ,
> + u16 bkQ,
> + u16 viQ,
> + u16 voQ,
> + u16 mgtQ,
> + u16 hiQ)

You can do better than this :)

try making it multiple variables per line.


> {
> u16 value16 = (rtw_read16(Adapter, REG_TRXDMA_CTRL) & 0x7);
>
> @@ -231,9 +228,13 @@ static void _InitNormalChipOneOutEpPriority(struct adapter *Adapter)
> break;
> }
>
> - _InitNormalChipRegPriority(
> - Adapter, value, value, value, value, value, value
> - );
> + _InitNormalChipRegPriority(Adapter,
> + value,
> + value,
> + value,
> + value,
> + value,
> + value);

That's crazy, perhaps the function should be changed?

thanks,

greg k-h