Re: [PATCH] smc: Use flexible array for SMCD connections

[Sidraya Jayagond]

On 19/05/26 6:22 am, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Store the per-DMB connection pointers in the SMCD device allocation
> instead of allocating a separate connection array.
> 
> This keeps the connection table tied to the SMCD device lifetime and
> simplifies the allocation and cleanup paths.
> 
> Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/net/smc.h |  2 +-
>  net/smc/smc_ism.c | 10 ++--------
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/smc.h b/include/net/smc.h
> index bfdc4c41f019..a2bc3ab88075 100644
> --- a/include/net/smc.h
> +++ b/include/net/smc.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ struct smcd_dev {
>  	struct dibs_dev *dibs;
>  	struct list_head list;
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> -	struct smc_connection **conn;
>  	struct list_head vlan;
>  	struct workqueue_struct *event_wq;
>  	u8 pnetid[SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN];
> @@ -50,6 +49,7 @@ struct smcd_dev {
>  	atomic_t lgr_cnt;
>  	wait_queue_head_t lgrs_deleted;
>  	u8 going_away : 1;
> +	struct smc_connection *conn[];
>  };
>  
>  #define SMC_HS_CTRL_NAME_MAX 16
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> index e0dba2c7b6e3..bde938c5eb39 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
> @@ -467,17 +467,14 @@ static struct smcd_dev *smcd_alloc_dev(const char *name, int max_dmbs)
>  {
>  	struct smcd_dev *smcd;
>  
> -	smcd = kzalloc_obj(*smcd);
> +	smcd = kzalloc_flex(*smcd, conn, max_dmbs);
>  	if (!smcd)
>  		return NULL;
> -	smcd->conn = kzalloc_objs(struct smc_connection *, max_dmbs);
> -	if (!smcd->conn)
> -		goto free_smcd;
>  
>  	smcd->event_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("ism_evt_wq-%s)",
>  						 WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, name);
>  	if (!smcd->event_wq)
> -		goto free_conn;
> +		goto free_smcd;
>  
>  	spin_lock_init(&smcd->lock);
>  	spin_lock_init(&smcd->lgr_lock);
> @@ -486,8 +483,6 @@ static struct smcd_dev *smcd_alloc_dev(const char *name, int max_dmbs)
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&smcd->lgrs_deleted);
>  	return smcd;
>  
> -free_conn:
> -	kfree(smcd->conn);
>  free_smcd:
>  	kfree(smcd);
>  	return NULL;
> @@ -557,7 +552,6 @@ static void smcd_unregister_dev(struct dibs_dev *dibs)
>  	list_del_init(&smcd->list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&smcd_dev_list.mutex);
>  	destroy_workqueue(smcd->event_wq);
> -	kfree(smcd->conn);
>  	kfree(smcd);
>  }
>  

Code changes looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>