Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board

From: Svyatoslav Ryhel

Date: Wed May 20 2026 - 11:38:24 EST


ср, 20 трав. 2026 р. о 18:08 Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
>
> On Sun, 10 May 2026, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>
> > MFD have rigid subdevice structure which does not allow flexible dynamic
> > subdevice linking. Address this by diverging CPCAP subdevice composition
> > to take into account board specific configuration.
> >
> > Create a common default subdevice composition, rename existing subdevice
> > composition into cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices since it targets mainly
> > Mapphone board.
> >
> > Removed st,6556002 as it is no longer applicable to all cases and
> > duplicates motorola,cpcap, which is used as the default composition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> > include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h | 6 ++
> > 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> Looking much better, thanks.
>
> Nit: A patch-level changelog really is much more helpful to reviewers.
>

Noted, but I will not guarantee that I will do patch-level changelogs, sorry.

> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > index d8243b956f87..f5a7fdd89dd5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> >
> > @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ struct cpcap_ddata {
> > struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irqdata[CPCAP_NR_IRQ_CHIPS];
> > const struct regmap_config *regmap_conf;
> > struct regmap *regmap;
> > + enum cpcap_variant variant;
> > };
> >
> > static int cpcap_sense_irq(struct regmap *regmap, int irq)
> > @@ -195,20 +197,6 @@ static int cpcap_init_irq(struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
> > - { .compatible = "st,6556002", },
> > - {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > -
> > -static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > - { .name = "cpcap", },
> > - { .name = "6556002", },
> > - {},
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > -
> > static const struct regmap_config cpcap_regmap_config = {
> > .reg_bits = 16,
> > .reg_stride = 4,
> > @@ -241,62 +229,76 @@ static int cpcap_resume(struct device *dev)
> >
> > static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(cpcap_pm, cpcap_suspend, cpcap_resume);
> >
> > -static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> > - {
> > - .name = "cpcap_adc",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap_battery",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-battery",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-charger",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-charger",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-regulator",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-regulator",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-rtc",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-rtc",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-usb-phy",
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-usb-phy",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-led",
> > - .id = 0,
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-red",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-led",
> > - .id = 1,
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-green",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-led",
> > - .id = 2,
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-blue",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-led",
> > - .id = 3,
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-adl",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-led",
> > - .id = 4,
> > - .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > - }, {
> > - .name = "cpcap-codec",
> > - }
> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_default_mfd_devices[] = {
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap_adc", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "motorola,cpcap-adc"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap_battery", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-battery"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-regulator", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-regulator"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-rtc", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "motorola,cpcap-rtc"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-pwrbutton", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-usb-phy", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-usb-phy"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "motorola,cpcap-led-red"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 1, "motorola,cpcap-led-green"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 2, "motorola,cpcap-led-blue"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 3, "motorola,cpcap-led-adl"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 4, "motorola,cpcap-led-cp"),
> > + MFD_CELL_NAME("cpcap-codec"),
> > +};
>
> Nit: I wouldn't complain if you wanted to have all of these on a single
> line for neatness.
>

Noted

> > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices[] = {
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap_adc", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-adc"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap_battery", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-battery"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-charger", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-charger"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-regulator", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-regulator"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-rtc", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "motorola,cpcap-rtc"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-pwrbutton", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-usb-phy", NULL, NULL, 0, 0,
> > + "motorola,mapphone-cpcap-usb-phy"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 0, "motorola,cpcap-led-red"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 1, "motorola,cpcap-led-green"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 2, "motorola,cpcap-led-blue"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 3, "motorola,cpcap-led-adl"),
> > + MFD_CELL_OF("cpcap-led", NULL, NULL, 0, 4, "motorola,cpcap-led-cp"),
> > + MFD_CELL_NAME("cpcap-codec"),
> > };
>
> A lot of these are duplicated, right?
>
> I would have a comment set, then the differences in separate containers.

It may be impossible to predict a generic setup since some devices may
require unique compatibles, other may not have LEDs, third may be
partially incompatible with existing cells. In other mfd cases
creating a generic bundle might be good, but in this case I would
suggest better to keep these separate entirely per-device. They will
not take much space, nor add confusion with these macros.

>
> > static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > {
> > struct cpcap_ddata *cpcap;
> > + const struct mfd_cell *cells;
> > + unsigned int num_cells;
> > int ret;
> >
> > cpcap = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*cpcap), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!cpcap)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + cpcap->variant = (enum cpcap_variant)spi_get_device_match_data(spi);
> > + if (!cpcap->variant)
> > + return -ENODEV;
>
> Isn't this covered in the 'default' below?
>

This is for case cpcap->variant = 0, it should never happen, but check
will not cause harm

>
> > + switch (cpcap->variant) {
> > + case CPCAP_DEFAULT:
> > + cells = cpcap_default_mfd_devices;
> > + num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_default_mfd_devices);
> > + break;
> > + case CPCAP_MAPPHONE:
> > + cells = cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices;
> > + num_cells = ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mapphone_mfd_devices);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, -EINVAL,
> > + "Unknown device %d\n", cpcap->variant);
>
> This should be -ENODEV.
>

hm, match is ENODEV cause it looks for device, here driver checks
id/variant, so shouldn't it be EINVAL? I assume error message should
be "Unknown device version" or "Unknown device ID"

> > + }
> > +
> > cpcap->spi = spi;
> > spi_set_drvdata(spi, cpcap);
> >
> > @@ -331,10 +333,28 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask = 0;
> > spi->dev.dma_mask = &spi->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
> >
> > - return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> > - ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > + return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cells, num_cells, NULL, 0, NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
> > + {
> > + .compatible = "motorola,cpcap",
> > + .data = (void *)CPCAP_DEFAULT
>
> Single line should be fine.
>

Noted

> > + }, {
> > + .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-cpcap",
> > + .data = (void *)CPCAP_MAPPHONE
> > + },
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cpcap_of_match);
> > +
> > +static const struct spi_device_id cpcap_spi_ids[] = {
> > + { "cpcap", CPCAP_DEFAULT },
> > + { "mapphone-cpcap", CPCAP_MAPPHONE },
> > + { /* sentinel */ }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, cpcap_spi_ids);
> > +
> > static struct spi_driver cpcap_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "cpcap-core",
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h b/include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h
> > index 981e5777deb7..1a85b06272c8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/motorola-cpcap.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
> > #define CPCAP_REVISION_2_0 0x10
> > #define CPCAP_REVISION_2_1 0x11
> >
> > +enum cpcap_variant {
> > + CPCAP_DEFAULT = 1,
> > + CPCAP_MAPPHONE,
> > + CPCAP_MAX
> > +};
> > +
> > /* CPCAP registers */
> > #define CPCAP_REG_INT1 0x0000 /* Interrupt 1 */
> > #define CPCAP_REG_INT2 0x0004 /* Interrupt 2 */
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones