Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/8] timekeeping: Account for clawback adjustment in ntp_error

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2026-05-20 at 12:47 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 12:28:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 3:04 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > But yea, it does get subtle and complicated, which is all the more
> > reason to make sure we have things well documented.
> > 
> > > > Miroslav's review and input here would also be good.
> > > 
> > > Ack. Thomas had nudged me to add Miroslav to Cc, which
> > > get_maintainers.pl had not.
> > 
> > Yeah. Maybe it would be good to get Miroslav added as a reviewer in
> > the MAINTAINERS file.
> > 
> > Miroslav: Any objection to that?
> 
> I'm ok with that, but I can't promise to provide any actual reviews.
> Loading all that context needed to understand the code is painful. It
> would be so nice if it could be simplified by switching to 64-bit
> multiplier.

I'll put that into a separate patch in my series, in with the bug fixes
before it gets to the fun proof-of-concept stuff at the end :)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature