Re: [PATCH 0/6] b43: complete N-PHY rev 8 + radio 2057 rev 8 support

[Joshua Peisach]

On Tue May 19, 2026 at 3:52 PM EDT, Michael Büsch wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2026 15:32:44 -0400
> "Joshua Peisach" <jpeisach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue May 19, 2026 at 11:58 AM EDT, Michael Büsch wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 May 2026 03:49:33 +0200
> > > Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In general this looks Ok.
> > > From the style I assume that this is AI generated, right?
> > > If so, can you tell us a bit more about the inputs used for the AI?
> > > What information is this implementation based on?  
> >
> > So... awkward question.
>
> Why?
>
> > Wasn't there just a conversation[1] about the
> > future development of this module, that was left off at "don't touch it
> > unless you're going to thouroughly test this",
>
> Sure. That's why I ask about the development methods used.
>
> > and now we are going to have a *LLM* work on this?
>
> I don't care whether code was generated with an LLM or not.
> What matters is the development methods used.

Fair enough. And it was tested anyway :) sorry for any perceived
arrogance.

I would tag Reviewed-by but I don't have a script to check the tables
(there probably is somewhere... it's a personal problem - a "skill
issue" as I sometimes like to call it).

-Josh