Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: wait for aborted connection before releasing last fuse_dev

[Berkant Koc]

On Mon, 18 May 2026 08:35:16 -0700, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, on mainline the references are meant to be ring->fc, eg

Confirmed, ring->fc on mainline. Reviewed-by recorded for Bernd's v6.14 backport path.

Bernd has since published the full 4-patch series via B4-Relay at 18:37 CEST, rebased onto Miklos' for-next (base-commit 040d71ac6470). On that branch the fuse_chan abstraction is in place, so the teardown path uses ring->chan / chan->conn rather than ring->fc. The series stays as-is for for-next.

Your inline diff is the basis for the mainline stable-backport once for-next lands.

I will run the two-arm Tested-by against for-next-base 040d71ac6470 (KASAN + lockdep + kmemleak, async-teardown race + baseline) and report numbers on-thread.

Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-7 berkoc-pipeline