Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] iio: accel: mma8452: improve coding style, pm and resource cleanup

[Jonathan Cameron]

On Mon, 18 May 2026 10:20:25 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 01:39:35AM +0530, Sanjay Chitroda wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:16:30PM +0530, Sanjay Chitroda wrote:  
> > > 
> > > This series contains a small fixes, cleanup and improvements to use
> > > modern kernel helper API and coding style for mma8452 accel driver.
> > > 
> > > The changes modernize mutex with guard(), dev_err_probe usage,
> > > resolve checkpatch CHECKS and pm_ptr macro usage.
> > > 
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Following input from Andy and Jonathan added new changes as following
> > >   0001: handle return value to have proper error propagation
> > >   0002: use non-devm API to maintain resource management LIFO order
> > >   0006: convert individual regulator using bulk regulator API
> > >   0009: use IIO cleanup helper for DIRECT_MODE
> > > - Address kernel coding stype specific review comment
> > > - Reorder local struct device and dev_err_probe change
> > > v2 series -> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260422165643.2148195-1-sanjayembedded@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - 0005: address review comment from Andy and Geert
> > >   and use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS macro
> > > - Added new cleanup channges in mma8452 driver
> > > 
> > > No functional behavior changes are intended.
> > > 
> > > Testing:
> > >   - Compiled with W=1
> > >   - Build-tested on QEMU x86_64
> > > 
> > > Feedback and reviews are very welcome.  
> 
> > It's been about two weeks since the latest posting, and it looks like
> > there haven't been any major comments so far atleast on initial changes
> > of series. I also don't see any progress on the iio/tesing branch yet.
> > 
> > Could you please guide me on how you'd like me to take this series forward?
> > I'm happy to rework/resend partial/full if needed or wait further.  
> 
> The recent flood of the patches in IIO makes maintainers and reviewers
> overloaded. If you want to help, be a good citizen, start reviewing others'
> work. Otherwise, wait when we have time (it make take a few weeks or more).
> 
Just to add a bit more info.  Whether I pick up partial sets is often
dependent on what else is going on at the time.  So generally unless I say
I'm doing it, just assume that a full new version of the series is needed.

Just to keep my own tracking simple I tend to make that decision at time
of review (rather than coming back later to see if I can grab them).

Anyhow, today it was fine to pick some up so I picked up 1-5.

Thanks,

Jonathan