Re: [PATCH 2/6] dma-resv: Define guards for context-less dma_resv locks

[Christian König]

On 5/18/26 11:14, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> On Mon, 18 May 2026 09:10:23 +0200
> Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/26 18:58, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> When used without a context, dma_resv are no different from regular
>>> locks. Define guards so we can use the guard-syntactic sugars for
>>> explicit/implicit scoped locks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> How do you want to upstream it? My preference would be drm-misc-next, but I think I can live with a panthor specific branch as well.
> 
> Everything Panthor related goes through drm-misc-next, so drm-misc-next
> also has my preference ;-). But I'd like to wait for more feedback on
> the other drm patches, and there are a few things I need to address in
> the panthor patches anyway, so it's likely to take a couple more weeks
> for this series to hit the drm-misc tree, unless you have a good reason
> to fast-track this specific patch.

Well the DMA-buf code itself uses dma_resv_lock/unlock and obviously has test cases for all the different variants.

So if you could provide a patch which just switches over the DMA-buf code itself to using guards I can happily take both into drm-misc-next even before the panthor patches are completely reviewed.

Regards,
Christian.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Boris