Re: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] net: stmmac: eic7700: enable clocks before syscon access and correct RX sampling timing

[李志]

> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Send time:Wednesday, 13/05/2026 07:13:15
> To: 李志 <lizhi2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: andrew+netdev@xxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx, robh@xxxxxxxxxx, krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx, mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx, alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx, rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pjw@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx, aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alex@xxxxxxxx, linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, maxime.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx, ningyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pinkesh.vaghela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pritesh.patel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, weishangjuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, horms@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] net: stmmac: eic7700: enable clocks before syscon access and correct RX sampling timing
> 
> On Tue, 12 May 2026 13:39:12 +0800 (GMT+08:00) 李志 wrote:
> > For the eth1 enablement part, my current understanding is that it
> > should be treated as a new independent v1 series for net-next,
> > since the scope and target tree have changed after the split.
> > 
> > Would you prefer this eth1 series to start as v1, or should it
> > continue as v8 for continuity with the original series?
> 
> v8 is better, but is the fix in net-next already?
> 
> If this is the posting you're referring to:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260507083214.192-1-lizhi2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> it has been dropped based on feedback from Maxime and I don't see a v2.

Yes, the eth0 fixes have now been reposted as a dedicated series targeting net:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260507083037.152-1-lizhi2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

The previous net-next eth1-related posting was dropped following your guidance
to first complete the eth0 fixes in net before continuing with eth1. I will
keep eth1 as v8 as previously suggested.

For the eth0 net series, I will split the remaining changes in v2 as suggested
by Maxime to improve reviewability and bisectability, and resend shortly.

Once that is completed, I will proceed with the eth1 enablement series (v8)
based on the updated context.

Thanks,
Zhi