Re: [PATCH v1] mm/shrinker: simplify shrinker_memcg_alloc() using guard()
From: wangxuewen
Date: Wed May 13 2026 - 03:59:14 EST
Hi,Muchun Song,
Thanks for your review.
I've updated the patch to v2 following your suggestions.
This change is only a local cleanup for this specific function, not part of any large-scale conversion to use the guard() mechanism.
Please review v2, thank you.
在 2026/5/12 17:10, Muchun Song 写道:
On May 12, 2026, at 16:55, wangxuewen <18810879172@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Use guard(mutex) to automatically handle shrinker_mutex locking and
unlocking in shrinker_memcg_alloc(). This removes the explicit
mutex_unlock() call, the goto-based error path, and the redundant
ret variable, resulting in cleaner and more concise code.
Signed-off-by: wangxuewen <wangxuewen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/shrinker.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 76b3f750cf65..1274130323bf 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -222,22 +222,19 @@ static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled() && !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
return -ENOSYS;
- mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&shrinker_mutex);
id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (id < 0)
- goto unlock;
+ return id;
if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
if (expand_shrinker_info(id)) {
idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
- goto unlock;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
}
shrinker->id = id;
- ret = 0;
-unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
- return ret;
One small thing: since ret is no longer used after this change,
it should be dropped from the declaration to avoid an unused-variable
warning:
- int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
+ int id;
Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks,
Muchun
+ return 0;
}
static void shrinker_memcg_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
--
2.25.1