Re: [PATCH bpf v3 2/3] bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks

From: bot+bpf-ci

Date: Tue May 12 2026 - 00:17:16 EST


> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 4ef0fd06cea5..c1e96df360c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -158,6 +159,105 @@ static inline void stack_map_build_id_set_ip(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id)
> memset(id->build_id, 0, BUILD_ID_SIZE_MAX);
> }
>
> +struct stack_map_vma_lock {
> + bool vma_locked;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> +};
> +
> +static struct vm_area_struct *
> +stack_map_lock_vma(struct stack_map_vma_lock *lock, unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = lock->mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mm))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, ip);
> + if (vma)
> + goto vma_locked;
> +
> + if (!mmap_read_trylock(mm))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + vma = vma_lookup(mm, ip);
> + if (!vma) {
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> + if (!vma_start_read_locked(vma)) {
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +#else
> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> + return NULL;
> +#endif
> +vma_locked:
> + lock->vma_locked = true;
> + lock->vma = vma;
> + return vma;
> +}
> +
> +static void stack_map_unlock_vma(struct stack_map_vma_lock *lock)
> +{
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = lock->vma;
> +
> + if (lock->vma_locked) {
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!vma))
> + goto out;
> + vma_end_read(vma);
> + }
> +out:
> + lock->vma_locked = false;
> + lock->vma = NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
> + u32 trace_nr)
> +{
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + struct stack_map_vma_lock lock = {
> + .vma_locked = false,
> + .vma = NULL,
> + .mm = mm,
> + };
> + unsigned long vm_pgoff, vm_start;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + struct file *file;
> + u64 ip;
> +
> + for (u32 i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
> + ip = READ_ONCE(id_offs[i].ip);
> + vma = stack_map_lock_vma(&lock, ip);
> + if (!vma || !vma->vm_file) {
^^^^^^^^

A subsystem pattern flags this as potentially concerning: the code uses
!vma->vm_file to classify the VMA as anonymous. Per mm-vma.md's VMA
classification rules, the correct test for anonymous VMAs is
vma_is_anonymous() (i.e. !vma->vm_ops). Some anonymous VMAs carry a
vm_file reference (e.g. private mappings of /dev/zero set via
vma_set_anonymous() while leaving vm_file populated).

On such VMAs, this code would proceed down the file-backed path and hand
/dev/zero (or any other vma_set_anonymous()-style driver file) to
build_id_parse_file() instead of immediately falling back to reporting
the raw IP. build_id_parse_file() would fail the ELF-magic check and
return an error, so the practical effect is a wasted pinned-file
reference and a pointless sleepable read attempt. However, the mm
subsystem guide directs that this pattern be reported.

The existing non-sleepable stack_map_get_build_id_offset()/build_id_parse()
in this same subsystem also uses !vma->vm_file, so the new code is
consistent with pre-existing style.

> + stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
> + stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);
> + continue;
> + }

Mykyta Yatsenko suggested an optimization in v2 that has not been
implemented: cache vm_start and vm_end, and if the next IP is in range,
reuse the previous build ID without locking the VMA. This would avoid
repeated lock/unlock cycles for consecutive IPs in the same VMA.

The current v3 code only caches the file reference for same-file
optimization, not the VMA range. See the original discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/8b2cf5ca-182e-4eb2-ab90-8fab9d81f6e1@xxxxxxxxx/

> +
> + file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
> + vm_pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff;
> + vm_start = vma->vm_start;
> + stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);
> +
> + /* build_id_parse_file() may block on filesystem reads */
> + if (build_id_parse_file(file, id_offs[i].build_id, NULL)) {
> + stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
> + fput(file);
> + continue;
> + }
> + fput(file);
> +
> + id_offs[i].offset = (vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + ip - vm_start;
> + id_offs[i].status = BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Expects all id_offs[i].ip values to be set to correct initial IPs.
> * They will be subsequently:
> @@ -178,6 +278,11 @@ static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
> const char *prev_build_id;
> int i;
>
> + if (may_fault && has_user_ctx) {
> + stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable(id_offs, trace_nr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> /* If the irq_work is in use, fall back to report ips. Same
> * fallback is used for kernel stack (!user) on a stackmap with
> * build_id.

Commit message:

> bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks
>
> Sleepable build ID parsing can block in __kernel_read() [1], so the
> stackmap sleepable path must not call it while holding mmap_lock or a
> per-VMA read lock.
> The issue and the fix are conceptually similar to a recent procfs
> patch [2].
> Resolve each covered VMA with a stable read-side reference, preferring
> lock_vma_under_rcu() and falling back to mmap_read_trylock() only long
> enough to acquire the VMA read lock. Take a reference to the backing
> file, drop the VMA lock, and then parse the build ID through
> (sleepable) build_id_parse_file().
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218005818.614819-1-shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260128183232.2854138-1-andrii@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Fixes: 777a8560fd29 ("lib/buildid: use __kernel_read() for sleepable context")

The existing Fixes tag points to commit 777a8560fd29 ("lib/buildid: use
__kernel_read() for sleepable context"), but the bug was actually
introduced by commit d4dd9775ec24 ("bpf: wire up sleepable
bpf_get_stack() and bpf_get_task_stack() helpers").

The d4dd9775ec24 commit introduced the pattern of calling potentially
sleepable build_id_parse() while holding mm locks via find_vma(). Commit
777a8560fd29 only made the latent blocking behavior more severe by using
__kernel_read(), but the architectural issue of calling sleepable
functions under locks was introduced earlier.

Should this be:

Fixes: d4dd9775ec24 ("bpf: wire up sleepable bpf_get_stack() and bpf_get_task_stack() helpers")


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/25711733137