Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] scripts: add kconfirm

[Jonathan Corbet]

Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 01:01:29AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Also, a nit, but I would really suggest putting it under tools/ rather
>> than in the scripts/ dumping ground.
>
> As if tools/ isn't its own dumping ground? :)

It is more structured and more amenable to useful MAINTAINERS entries.

> While I can understand the desire to avoid adding more random stuff to
> scripts/, it sets a confusing precedent because tools/ is not a part of
> Kbuild, so I would not expect tools that would run within Kbuild to live
> there (which this one appears to do). While there are obvious exceptions
> such as objtool and resolve_btfids,

...and the docs build system...

> I would like to avoid adding new
> ones, which aligns with the comment added by Masahiro's commit
> 6e6ef2da3a28 ("Makefile: add comment to discourage tools/* addition for
> kernel builds"). Maybe this could be mitigated with a tools/kbuild/
> directory or something but not sure. Just some additional input.

I don't understand that reticence.  As we build up more tools, why not
organize them in a directory tree, perhaps called "tools", where we can
track who's responsible for the various subtrees?

Thanks,

jon