Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: another way to set large folio by remembering inode number

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 04:44:04PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Please add the relevant mailing lists when adding new user interfaces.
> > 
> > And I'm not sure hacks working around the proper large folio
> > implementation are something that should be merged upstream.
> 
> Cc'ed linux-api and linux-fsdevel onto the patch thread with a proposal that
> I'm not sure it's acceptable or not. 

You haven't sent a proposal.  This is a reply to a reply to a reply of a
patch.  There's no justification for why f2fs is so special that it
needs this.  What the hell is going on?  You know this is not the way to
get code merged into Linux.