Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: moore: implement gpio_chip::get_direction()

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 11:24 AM Frank Wunderlich
<frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. April 2026 um 09:09
> > Von: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > An: "Frank Wunderlich" <linux@xxxxxxxxx>, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Linus Walleij" <linusw@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>, "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CC: linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Betreff: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: moore: implement gpio_chip::get_direction()
> >
> > If the gpio_chip::get_direction() callback is not implemented by the GPIO
> > controller driver, GPIOLIB emits a warning.
> >
> > Implement get_direction() for the GPIO part of pinctrl-moore.
> >
> > Fixes: 471e998c0e31 ("gpiolib: remove redundant callback check")
> > Fixes: e623c4303ed1 ("gpiolib: sanitize the return value of gpio_chip::get_direction()")
> > Reported-by: Frank Wunderlich <linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> please use the email i used for SoB in my linked patch (closes link below), the other email i use only for sending patches due to mail provider limitation.

I can't fix this up because the closes link isn't working right now.
Is it the same
as the one this mail came from frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

Yours,
Linus Walleij