RE: [PATCH v4 4/7] fs,x86/resctrl: Add architecture hooks for every mount/unmount

[Luck, Tony]

> >> I do not have a clear understanding of how the new implementation with registration
> >> function will look to understand the races involved.
> >
> > I think I'm ready with v5 of the series. I can post (as "RFC") so you
>
> You consider it ready without completing this discussion? I interpret this to mean that
> I am wasting my time trying to discuss.
>
> > can see, and comment, on the details.
>
> ... and it is already posted ... before this discussion is complete ... unless you feel
> that the hour between your response here and the posting of the new version is sufficient
> grace for me to respond.
> The first four versions of this work were all sent within one week. I tried to
> collaborate with you on v4 but now you sent v5 without completing the discussion.
> I cannot collaborate with such rapid attempts at throwing stuff to see what sticks.

My intent in posting (as RFC as suggested by you for code that isn't ready for upstream)
was simply to give you visibility to the registration mechanism that I'd implemented in
response to Christoph's comment that I should not use symbol_get() or symbol_request().

I'm looking at your suggestion for asynchronous update by architecture for use on next
mount.

-Tony