Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: x86: Rate-limit global clock updates on vCPU load

From: Lei Chen

Date: Thu Apr 09 2026 - 09:03:29 EST


On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 2:02 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026, Lei Chen wrote:
> > commit 446fcce2a52b ("Revert "x86: kvm: rate-limit global clock updates"")
> > dropped the rate limiting for KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE.
> >
> > As a result, kvm_arch_vcpu_load() can queue global clock update requests
> > every time a vCPU is scheduled when the master clock is disabled or when
> > the vCPU is loaded for the first time.
> >
> > Restore the throttling with a per-VM ratelimit state and gate
> > KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE through __ratelimit(), so frequent vCPU
> > scheduling does not generate a steady stream of redundant clock update
> > requests.
> >
> > Fixes: 446fcce2a52b ("Revert "x86: kvm: rate-limit global clock updates"")
> > Signed-off-by: Lei Chen <lei.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: Jaroslav Pulchart <jaroslav.pulchart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAK8fFZ5gY8_Mw2A=iZVFNVKQNrXQzVsn-HTd+Me9K6ZfmdgA+Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 5 ++++-
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 5a3bfa293e8b..6d3d3f19af01 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1453,6 +1453,8 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> > bool use_master_clock;
> > u64 master_kernel_ns;
> > u64 master_cycle_now;
> > + /* how often to make KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE on vcpu sched*/
>
> Eh, I would just omit this comment. If we want to document the ratelimit,
> the function comment above kvm_gen_kvmclock_update() is the best place for it.
>
> > + struct ratelimit_state kvmclock_update_rs;
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
> > struct kvm_hv hyperv;
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 63afdb6bb078..4a37027cc0b8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -5211,7 +5211,9 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> > * kvmclock on vcpu->cpu migration
> > */
> > if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.use_master_clock || vcpu->cpu == -1)
> > - kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> > + if (__ratelimit(&vcpu->kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_rs))
> > + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
>
> To maintain pre-revert compatibility, where KVM did this:
>
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, v);
> schedule_delayed_work(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work,
> KVMCLOCK_UPDATE_DELAY);
>
>
> the ratelimit should be on blasting KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE to *all* vCPUs, but KVM
> should still trigger KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE on the initiating vCPU so that the
> immediate update goes through.
>
> That will also apply the ratelimiting to kvm_write_system_time(), though if a
> guest is changing system time that fast, it probably has other issues :-)
>
This patch does not impact kvm_write_system_time, which works as follows:

kvm_write_system_time
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);


vcpu_enter_guest
if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu))
kvm_gen_kvmclock_update(vcpu);
kvm_for_each_vcpu
kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);

This patch limits the rate of GLOBAL_CLOCK_UPDATE only in kvm_arch_vcpu_load.

Maybe I missed something?

> Completely untested, but this?
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++--------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c470e40a00aa..f14009f25a3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> bool use_master_clock;
> u64 master_kernel_ns;
> u64 master_cycle_now;
> + struct ratelimit_state kvmclock_update_rs;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_HYPERV
> struct kvm_hv hyperv;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 0a1b63c63d1a..5dc33f207a83 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3522,16 +3522,12 @@ uint64_t kvm_get_wall_clock_epoch(struct kvm *kvm)
> * The worst case for a remote vcpu to update its kvmclock
> * is then bounded by maximum nohz sleep latency.
> */
> -static void kvm_gen_kvmclock_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> +static void kvm_gen_kvmclock_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - unsigned long i;
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> - struct kvm *kvm = v->kvm;
> -
> - kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + if (__ratelimit(&vcpu->kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_rs))
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> - kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> - }
> + else
> + kvm_make_all_cpus_request(vcpu->kvm, KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE);
> }
>
> /* These helpers are safe iff @msr is known to be an MCx bank MSR. */
> @@ -13366,6 +13362,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
> raw_spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
> mutex_init(&kvm->arch.apic_map_lock);
> seqcount_raw_spinlock_init(&kvm->arch.pvclock_sc, &kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
> + ratelimit_state_init(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_rs, HZ, 10);
> kvm->arch.kvmclock_offset = -get_kvmclock_base_ns();
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock, flags);
>
> base-commit: b89df297a47e641581ee67793592e5c6ae0428f4
> --